MODERN INDIAN HISTORY · FOUNDATION SERIES

Moderates and Extremists — Methods, Leaders and the Surat Split of 1907

Petition or pressure? The quarrel over how to fight the British that broke the Congress in two on the banks of the Tapti.

SSCBankState PSC11 MIN READ
Take the test — coming soon

One goal, two roads

Both sides wanted a better deal for India. One believed in asking well; the other believed asking was the problem.

For its first twenty years the Congress was run by the Moderates. Around 1905 a younger, angrier group — the Extremists — challenged their methods, and in 1907 the Congress split at Surat. This page covers who the two groups were, exactly how they differed, and how the split happened.

The two camps compared

ModeratesExtremists
Also calledEarly Nationalists, Naram DalAssertive Nationalists, Garam Dal
Main leadersGokhale, Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, Surendranath Banerjea, W.C. BonnerjeeLal-Bal-Pal: Lala Lajpat Rai (Punjab), Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Maharashtra), Bipin Chandra Pal (Bengal), plus Aurobindo Ghosh
GoalReforms and self-government gradually, within the British EmpireSwaraj — self-rule, demanded now, not requested later
MethodsThe three Ps: Prayers, Petitions, Protests — resolutions, delegations, constitutional argumentSwadeshi, boycott, national education, passive resistance — pressure, not persuasion
Faith in BritainBelieved British rule could be reformed and British justice appealed toBelieved British rule rested on exploitation and would yield only to pressure
Social baseLawyers, professionals, an educated eliteSought to bring ordinary people into politics
KEY TERM
Mendicancy

The Extremists mocked Moderate methods as mendicancy — begging. The word means relying on requests and petitions to a power that has no reason to listen. Tilak's answer to it became the most famous sentence of the era: Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it.

BE FAIR TO THE MODERATES

It is easy to remember the Moderates as weak, but their work laid the foundation everything else stood on. They created the national platform, trained a political generation, and — through Naoroji's Drain Theory — built the economic case against British rule that every later movement used. The Extremists inherited an argument the Moderates had already won.

The road to Surat

1905
Partition of Bengal

Curzon's partition outraged the country and made the Moderate response look feeble. The Swadeshi and Boycott movement gave the Extremists their method and their moment.

1906
Calcutta session

Dadabhai Naoroji, respected by both camps, was brought in as a compromise President. The session passed resolutions on Swadeshi, Boycott and National Education, and Naoroji declared the Congress goal to be Swaraj — self-government. Both sides claimed the word; each meant something different by it.

December 1907
The Surat Split

The session met at Surat, on the banks of the Tapti. The Extremists wanted Tilak or Lala Lajpat Rai as President; the Moderates secured Rash Behari Ghosh. The Extremists feared the Calcutta resolutions would be dropped. The session collapsed in uproar — famously, a shoe was flung — and the Congress broke in two. The Moderates kept the organisation.

WHY THE VENUE WAS SURAT AT ALL

The session was originally planned for Nagpur, where Extremist feeling ran strong. It was shifted to Surat, in Gujarat — safe Moderate ground — partly because Congress convention barred a President from his home province, which conveniently ruled out Tilak presiding in western India. The venue itself was a move in the fight.

What followed the split

  • The government struck at the now-isolated Extremists: Tilak was tried in 1908 and sent to Mandalay jail in Burma for six years
  • Bipin Chandra Pal and Aurobindo Ghosh withdrew from active politics; Lala Lajpat Rai went abroad for a period
  • The Moderates, holding an emptied Congress, accepted the Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909 — with their separate electorates
  • The two wings reunited only in 1916, at the Lucknow session, the same session that produced the Congress-League Pact
CHECK YOURSELF

Why did the Extremists reject the Moderate method of petitions?

Because they believed British rule rested on exploitation of India, not on ignorance of Indian conditions. A ruler who profits from the arrangement will not change it because he is asked politely. Only pressure — Swadeshi, boycott, mass mobilisation — could raise the cost of ruling India.

REMEMBER

Lal-Bal-Pal, Punjab-Maharashtra-Bengal. The names and their provinces in one rhythm. And for the split: Surat, Tapti, 1907, Rash Behari Ghosh in the chair.

Everything on one look

The camps, the leaders, the split and the aftermath.

THE TWO CAMPS
  • Moderates were called Naram Dal, Extremists Garam Dal
  • Gokhale, Naoroji and Banerjea led the Moderates
  • Lal-Bal-Pal led the Extremists
  • Lajpat Rai from Punjab, Tilak from Maharashtra, Pal from Bengal
  • Moderate methods were the three Ps — prayers, petitions, protests
  • Extremist methods were Swadeshi, boycott and national education
THE SPLIT
  • The 1906 Calcutta session declared Swaraj the goal under Naoroji
  • The Congress split at Surat in December 1907
  • Surat stands on the banks of the Tapti river
  • Rash Behari Ghosh was the President at Surat
  • Tilak was jailed at Mandalay in 1908 for six years
  • The two wings reunited at Lucknow in 1916
COMMON TRAPS
  • The Surat Split happened in December 1907, not 1906
  • Rash Behari Ghosh, not Tilak, presided over the Surat session
  • Lal is Lajpat Rai, Bal is Tilak, Pal is Bipin Chandra Pal — match names correctly
  • Naoroji presided at Calcutta 1906 as a compromise candidate
  • The goal of Swaraj was declared at Calcutta in 1906, before the split
  • Surat is on the Tapti, and the session was moved there from Nagpur
  • Tilak was jailed at Mandalay in Burma in 1908
  • The Moderates kept control of the Congress after the split
  • The reunion came at Lucknow in 1916, not immediately after 1907
  • Both camps wanted self-government — they differed on method and pace
QUICK BYTES
  • The Moderates dominated the Congress from 1885 to about 1905
  • The Moderates were also called the Naram Dal
  • Gokhale, Naoroji, Mehta and Surendranath Banerjea were leading Moderates
  • Moderate methods are summarised as the three Ps — prayers, petitions and protests
  • Critics mocked Moderate politics as mendicancy, meaning begging
  • The Extremists were also called the Garam Dal
  • The Extremist trio was Lal-Bal-Pal
  • Lala Lajpat Rai led Extremist politics in Punjab
  • Bal Gangadhar Tilak led Extremist politics in Maharashtra
  • Bipin Chandra Pal led Extremist politics in Bengal
  • Tilak declared that Swaraj is my birthright, and I shall have it
  • The Partition of Bengal in 1905 strengthened the Extremists
  • Naoroji presided over the 1906 Calcutta session as a compromise
  • The Calcutta session of 1906 declared Swaraj as the Congress goal
  • The Congress split at Surat in December 1907
  • Surat lies on the banks of the river Tapti
  • The Surat venue was shifted from Nagpur to keep Tilak from presiding
  • Rash Behari Ghosh presided over the Surat session
  • Tilak was sentenced in 1908 to six years at Mandalay jail in Burma
  • Lala Lajpat Rai went abroad and Pal withdrew from politics after the split
  • The Moderates retained control of the Congress organisation
  • The Moderates and Extremists reunited at the Lucknow session of 1916

Frequently Asked Questions

Who were the Moderates and who were the Extremists?

The Moderates, or Naram Dal, dominated the Congress from 1885 to about 1905 and included Gokhale, Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta and Surendranath Banerjea. The Extremists, or Garam Dal, were led by the trio Lal-Bal-Pal — Lala Lajpat Rai of Punjab, Bal Gangadhar Tilak of Maharashtra and Bipin Chandra Pal of Bengal — along with Aurobindo Ghosh.

How did the methods of the Moderates and Extremists differ?

The Moderates used constitutional methods summarised as the three Ps — prayers, petitions and protests — believing British rule could be reformed by persuasion. The Extremists demanded Swaraj through Swadeshi, boycott, national education and passive resistance, believing that a rule based on exploitation would respond only to pressure.

What was the Surat Split?

At the Congress session of December 1907 at Surat, on the banks of the Tapti, the quarrel between the two wings came to a head. The Extremists wanted Tilak or Lala Lajpat Rai as President while the Moderates secured Rash Behari Ghosh, and the Extremists feared the Calcutta resolutions on Swadeshi and boycott would be dropped. The session collapsed in disorder and the Congress split, with the Moderates keeping the organisation.

Why was the 1907 session held at Surat instead of Nagpur?

Nagpur was strong Extremist ground, so the venue was shifted to Surat in Gujarat, considered safe for the Moderates. Congress convention also barred a President from presiding in his home province, and holding the session in western India conveniently ruled out Tilak taking the chair.

What happened to the Extremist leaders after the split?

The government moved against them once they were isolated. Tilak was tried in 1908 and sentenced to six years in Mandalay jail in Burma, Bipin Chandra Pal and Aurobindo Ghosh withdrew from active politics, and Lala Lajpat Rai spent time abroad. Extremist politics was effectively suppressed for nearly a decade.

What did the Calcutta session of 1906 decide?

With Dadabhai Naoroji presiding as a compromise candidate acceptable to both wings, the session declared Swaraj — self-government — as the goal of the Congress and passed resolutions supporting Swadeshi, Boycott and National Education. Both camps accepted the word Swaraj while meaning different things by it.

When did the Moderates and Extremists reunite?

At the Lucknow session of 1916, nine years after the split. The same session also produced the Lucknow Pact between the Congress and the Muslim League, making 1916 a year of double reunion in nationalist politics.

More in Modern Indian History

Advent of the EuropeansThe English East India CompanyBritish Expansion in IndiaBattle of PlasseyBattle of BuxarSubsidiary AllianceDoctrine of LapseAnglo-Mysore WarsAnglo-Maratha WarsAnglo-Sikh WarsBritish Economic PoliciesLand Revenue SystemsDrain of WealthGovernors-General and ViceroysConstitutional Development under British RuleRegulating and Charter ActsGovernment of India ActsPeasant and Tribal MovementsThe Revolt of 1857Socio-Religious Reform MovementsIndian National MovementFormation of the Indian National CongressPartition of Bengal and Swadeshi MovementRevolutionary Movements in IndiaGandhian EraChamparan, Ahmedabad and KhedaRowlatt Act and Jallianwala BaghKhilafat and Non-Cooperation MovementSimon Commission and Nehru ReportCivil Disobedience Movement and Dandi MarchRound Table Conferences and Poona PactQuit India MovementINA and Subhas Chandra BoseCabinet Mission and IndependenceIntegration of Princely StatesNewspapers and Journals in British India

← All Modern Indian History notes